Protecting the Innocent

All proceeds above and beyond the $300 we raise for Fierce, Freethinking Fatties will go to Collective Shout, an organization that is battle the sexual exploitation of women and minors in Australia. One of the founders, Lydia Jade Turner, explains why the work of Collective Shout matters to the Fat Acceptance movement and why we should support them financially. Collective Shout has had remarkable success in eliminating offensive advertising in Australia and is setting the bar for how to address this issue in the United States.

In recent years there has been a growing backlash against the prescription of a rigid beauty ideal. The bombardment of images of ultra-slim models, across a range of mediums, is increasingly gaining recognition as having a harmful effect on girls and women. Late last year, 45 international eating disorder experts released a statement, reporting that after reviewing over 100 international studies, the evidence was “overwhelming” that these images contributed to increasing rates of anxiety, depression, sexual dissatisfaction, low self-esteem, unhealthy weight loss behaviours, and eating disorders.

Rather than seeing eating disorders as “extreme” responses to a culture that actively discriminates against those labelled fat, the Health At Every Size (HAES) movement recognises unhealthy weight loss practices have become culturally normative as a consequence. When fat people — especially fat women — are depicted in the media, they are usually held up as objects of ridicule, with a barrage of negative characteristics attacking their intellect, integrity, self-worth, and sexuality. For this reason, allowing “plus-size” or fat women to be depicted as “sexy mynx” may seem liberating, giving permission and visibility to women who are systematically denied sexual identity. Yet the need to prove sexual acceptance reveals the required participation in a discourse of oppression towards women of all sizes – in order to achieve visibility.

We need to discuss the wider problem of the hyper-sexualisation of girls and women in media everywhere. It is not any one particular image that is problematic; but rather the reiteration of the same sexualised images that create a harmful cultural narrative of what it means to be a girl or woman in industrialized nations today. When corporations are given unfettered power, abuse of the consumer is a result. We have already seen this demonstrated in the massive conflicts of interest in obesity research and unethical practices promising thinness. It is now time to recognise that global brands are contributing to illness by cashing in on the narrow way in which women and girls are being depicted in media – even when the ideal is expanded to include fatter women.

While the beauty ideal for decades had already required women to be (usually) white and ultra-slim, pornographic themes are rapidly creeping into mainstream media, showing women in ways that suggest they are nothing more than sexual service stations for men. Consider Australian brand Lovable’s latest campaign. Employing Miss Universe, it shows Jennifer Hawkins in bra and undies, suggestively licking an ice cream with white liquid running down her arms, in reference to male ejaculation.

Then there are Calvin Klein and Dolce & Gabbana ads, known for “pushing boundaries,” with many of their ads alluding to gang rape and violence against women, used in outdoor advertising. One Dolce & Gabbana ad has now been withdrawn in Italy.

In Argentina, Unilever’s child company Axe has launched ads that encourage boys to sexually harass women.

Unilever’s other child company claims it will open a lodge in Sydney later this year, promoting female servitude as “the ultimate male fantasy,” with scantily clad young staff obeying men’s orders in adherence to the lodge’s central theme of “tell her what to do.”

Women are frequently positioned very differently from men in media. Often shown as passive, vulnerable, scantily clad, headless, and, sometimes, dead, such as in these ads these images inform women over and over that their body primarily exists for the purpose of evoking male desire, as though their bodies are merely sex aids. Robbing them of their humanity, women are often referred to as “it” or “that,” for example on Facebook’s Lynx Effect UK site fans say things like “you no [sic] you would ruin that all night long” commenting on photos of young women in bikinis.  Axe, also a child-company of Unilever, has ads recommending men use its shower gel to “scrub away the skank” the morning after a regretted sexual encounter (including women who are disabled, ill, or elderly).

These images and language choices have a very dehumanizing effect, which is dangerous on many levels.  They help create a climate which increases violence against women or at least puts women in danger of violence. As we see on Lynx Effect Ireland’s page, fans discuss types of women they dislike: “She’s a bitch,” says one commentator. Others advocate violence against them, saying things like “spray Lynx in the face.” Lynx Effect Ireland insists this is all just “tongue-in-cheek.” Lynx are not alone in portraying violence against women as sexy.

It is not just women that are affected. Given that many of these images are displayed in public areas, children can’t be protected from seeing them. Yet if such images were shown to a child by a pedophile in a private area, we would call this “grooming.” Images such as these are also not allowed in the workplace, as they are considered a form of sexual harassment, yet they pollute our public landscape.

What message do these images send boys about how women should be treated? What message do they send girls about their own bodies and self-worth? Academic psychologist Cordelia Fine revealed numerous studies confirming that environments that cue gender stereotypes negatively affect how men interact with women, even when women are fully clothed. With advertisements positioning women as sex objects, such as in this banned Toyota Yaris ad,  this “drip drip effect” has a detrimental impact on women, and on the way men relate to them.

Children are further affected when corporations try to out-sell competitors by pushing boundaries by “adultifying” and sexualising them. Up until two weeks ago, corporate giant BONDS was selling bras for girls as young as six. They weren’t the only ones. Retail chain Best & Less, and even Kmart was stocking “bralettes” for little girls. Another company went as far as selling padded bras — with lace — for six-year-olds.

These messages go against the spirit of the Health At Every Size and Fat Acceptance movements, as they erode body trust while inducing bodily anxieties, for girls of all sizes. Retail chain Supre whose target market are “tweens” ages 6-12 has sold t-shirts stating “Pussy Power” and “Santa’s Bitch.” In rap/hip hop culture this means the girl is “owned” by Santa as he is her “pimp.”

Another retail chain, Witchery was just this week exposed for their latest catalogue showing little girls wearing mini-adult clothing and striking adult poses.

While these are not sexualised images, adultifying girls blurs the line between girls and women, where girls feel increasing pressure to achieve the same beauty ideals traditionally applied only to their mothers. The cultural messaging teaches them that their worth depends primarily on whether they are “hot-or-not,” instead of fostering real values, talent, and intellect. It is predictable these days that when a young female celebrity reaches the age of 16, she must “prove” she is “all grown up” by stripping down, such as in the examples of pop singers Gabriella Cilmi and Miley Cyrus. Funny how young male celebrities are never required to do the same.

When a “plus-size” woman is allowed to be “sexy,” she is still positioned as a sexual object rather than one who “owns” her own sexuality and personhood.  Take former Australian Idol contestant Ricky-Lee Coulter for example. It was considered a victory posing her on the cover of lad’s mag Ralph because she was not waif-like.

Yet she was required to be scantily clad, donning a dominatrix-style outfit with whip. “Bigger” women are often positioned in this way. We are still attaching unhealthy messages to women of all sizes — being “plus-size” or fat does not provide immunity against the damaging effects of objectification.

While the Health At Every Size and Fat Acceptance movements actively speak out against the harms of promoting thinness as the only acceptable body type, I urge all supporters to consider also supporting movements that speak out against other harmful messages to girls and women about their bodies, messages that tell women all they are “good for.” While some argue that the increasing sexualisation of girls and women is sexually liberating, I say these corporate messages are actually sexually prescriptive.

As Gail Dines argues in her latest book “Pornland,” it’s time we stopped allowing corporations to hijack our sexuality. Accepting one’s body does not include feeling that everyone must have big breasts or obligatory fattened lips to feel good about themselves, nor that their stripping is necessary to prove their newfound body-love. Just as fat is not “evidence” of poor health, neither is aging — yet we are told on shows like Oprah that aging is somehow linked to not taking good care of oneself. It’s imperative these movements collaborate with others that challenge other notions that also affect body image.

In Australia, a new grassroots advocacy group has already achieved a raft of successes against advertisers, corporations and marketers which promote body shame through their hyper-sexualised products and marketing practices. Headed by author and social commentator Melinda Tankard Reist, Collective Shout: For a World Free of Sexploitation, has managed to stop the sale of bras and bra-like products to girls under age 10, block a rape-simulation game console called RapeLay from being accessed in Australia, successfully pressured Woolworths to cancel its support of the Lynx Lodge, amongst many other wins. Collective Shout is less than a year old already with over 1,500 members worldwide. If you would like to show your support, please sign up here.